Let me start with this disclaimer--I do not follow Shoq, Simon, or Karoli. Based on what some of Twitter pals have told me, dissension has broken out between their factions over who turned the Connect the Left (CTL) twitter account to Unite Blue (UB). I don't care about that. In fact, I don't care how Unite Blue took control of the Connect the Left Twitter account. What concerns me is that UB did take take over the CTL. On February 6th, I blogged about my concerns about Unite Blue. I still have those concerns and more. Since I wrote that blog, I've taken a hiatus from Twitter.
I love Twitter. I have made some wonderful and lasting friendships there. Although I first got on because I'm a political junkie, I enjoy the nonpolitical chit chat as much as the political discussion. I have access to many interesting links and thoughtful blog posts by @smartypants32, @D_V_E, and @root_e to name just a few of my favorites. Twitter also brings a social life right into my home, which is what I like the best.
I am a month from being 65, disabled because of severe arthritis, and degenerative spinal disease which leave me in chronic pain. There isn't an hour that goes by that I'm not in pain; therefore, I am stuck at home most of the day. I don't want anyone's sympathy because I have a wonderful life in spite of that. What I am trying to convey is how important Twitter is to me because I'm not very mobile. On Twitter I can talk politics, mindlessly chit chat with friends, crack a few jokes, even whine and most importantly, I can forget about the pain.
Once you understand my relationship with Twitter, maybe you'll understand how difficult it was for me to leave. Some of my tweeps told me to ignore Unite Blue, and others told me to unfollow or block UB members. Both are difficult for me to do. I have a lot of longtime followers who are now UB members, and when at least every other tweet has to do with UB or has so many hashtags that take up half the 140 characters, those tweets are difficult to ignore. Nor do I want to unfollow tweeps whom I've followed and who have followed me for 2-3 years. I keep hoping they'll come to their senses soon.
I decided to take a break from Twitter. I don't how long I'll be gone--maybe I'll be on tomorrow, next week, or even next month. But as long as these four conditions exist in my time line, I'll be on hiatus.
Cultish behavior of members: The other morning when I got on Twitter, I saw many disturbing tweets that suggested folks go through their followers and drop anyone not following UB to make room for UB members. Sadly, many of the tweeps who were unfollowed have thousands and thousands of tweets while many UB members I've seen have less than a thousand tweets. UB is clearly about quantity, not quality. For many, loyalty to UB has become more important than loyalty to liberal causes or values or even longtime followers. Many tweets contain gushing endorsements of UB, proclaiming that Unite Blue has changed their lives or that UB is the most important thing that has happened to them. Other tweets brag about UB ratings, whatever that means. Although these tweets irritate me, I don't want to unfollow longtime tweeps. I just want them to get a grip.
Divisive: Since I first blogged about UB, I've received many DMs from tweeps expressing concerns about UB, but, fearful they themselves might be spam blocked by members, they are unwilling to speak out. Several of us who have done nothing more than ask legitimate questions, questions everyone should be asking, have been demonized by some UB members. In fact, I see more loyalty to UB by some than to the Democratic Party and/or liberal causes. Unite Blue? How about Divide Blue?
Fear-based: I think the TGDN (Twitter Gulag Defense Network) threat has been highly exaggerated. I have seen one follower spam blocked and others have told me that maybe one or two of their followers have had their accounts suspended, for which there could be a variety of reasons. This frenzy of fear reminds me of the way Bush's Homeland Security kept anxiety levels high by using the the color-coded terrorist alert.
Inorganic: Unite Blue was not a spontaneous, organic movement. It was started by a Twitter consulting company. It wasn't started from scratch; it co-opted an already existing Twitter account.
Zach Green or @140elect stole my playground. He turned my TL into something unrecognizable--a nonstop stream of praise for Unite Blue, UB hashtags and knee jerk reactions to fear of TGDN. I'll unite behind the Democratic Party, fellow liberals, and most certainly behind Barack Obama, but I don't see where Zach Green shares my loyalties. I don't want to be part of the Green Gang on twitter, and I want them to get off my playground. I miss my "old" buddies, and I want them back, not the zombiefied UB followers I see now. (Follow up post. Rebuttal of the Rebuttal: Say What, Zach?)
ShareThis
9 comments:
I refuse to follow Unite Blue. You have to follow thousands of people back and I am very picky about who I follow. I guess that's why I fluctuate between 195 to 200 followers at any given time...and so few.
I like following people that have something to add to the conversation. Tweet articles of ALL kinds!
So if that is what it takes to get thousands of followers I think I will stick with my little group I follow and the smaller group that follows me back.
p.s. most of the 850+ I follow are politicians so I can tell them what i think!
Well said, sir. But I would like to clarify something ambiguous in your first paragraph. You wrote:" dissension has broken out between their factions over who turned the Connect the Left (CTL)."
"Ranks" suggests that Karoli, Simon, Eileen and I were some how aligned, and some factionalism broke out among us. That is just not the case. Karoli and I are friends, both of whom never followed #connectTheLeft to begin with. We simply had the same issues with and questions about UB that you did, and resented what was reported to be a usurpation of the ConnectTheLeftAccount (this remains in dispute, and I am waiting on Osborneink's investigations and conclusions about it). I had simply asked Simon (who has been no more than a Twitter gadfly to me, who had come and gone in my stream, usually in response to some opportunity he smelled somewhere) if he had done what Eileen had alleged by DM that he had done. He unfollowed me rather than answer, so I continued the threat for a few tweets in public (I detest such DM and run/block tactics).
There was no "factionalism" at work here, other than that which a commercial business venture owned by the Greens seems to have done a great job of creating amongst previously like-minded progressives. I am glad you posted this.
My own reply to Zach can be read here.
http://shoqvalue.com/my-reply-to-zach-green-about-uniteblue
It was posted to his blog several days ago, but he has yet to post it as a comment to his FAQ-style rant. So much for diversity of opinion among progressives. That was one of the most telling indications I have had yet that the Greens are acting in the interests of their business interests, and not in the interests of Progressives on Twitter.
In my comment above, there is a typo: "...so I continued the threat" should have read "continued the threaD," (as in a discussion thread). Sorry
Whenever there's conflict on Twitter, there's Shoq trying to insert himself in the middle of it.
Pathetic.
As for using "dissension" & "faction"--call it as I see it. Oh BTW I'm woman. DCNM
Another excellent post here. The biggest complaint I hear about UB is the way they seemed to show up suddenly as everyone's new best friend. There was nothing organic or real about their sudden rise -- they gamed the system, and that always makes people leery.
Ive asked Zach directly to tell me the teaparty 140 se cupp conference was false he ignores my request and yet follows me on twitter.
I just researched this. The SE Cupp Tea Party debate @140TownHall was held on 7/20/2011 using technology provided by 140Dev.com/Adam Green. More than a year later, 9/21/12, 140Dev + 140Elect (Zach Green) ssued a press release via PR Web "Aligning Our Twitter Code With Our Politics: Unite Blue." While anything is possible, perhaps the Greens altered their business model to, as they say, reflect their politics. Not everything is conspiratorial. Just a thought.
When you have accessibility to via several different dealer, look for just a provider having many wrist watches you can pick by. Even superior, ask intended for catalogues together with literature you could plainly observe how a a number of view would seem. You have to know the precise middleman together with refund policy that is certainly crucial regarding extended guide. Realizing the policies Replica Chopard watches will likely be essential should you encounter cases when you require to go Replica Ulysse Nardin watches UK back an piece and obtain reimbursement. Despite as a general replica Balenciaga Classic handbags little-known title in the states, Armand Nicolet timepieces maintain a classic custom that's since pure considering that the morning of which began on the montres Breguet faux small town regarding Tramelan, Swiss. Excellent reliability, trustworthy performance together with unequalled elegance were being on the list of substantial ideals that can inspired this development connected Replica Hublot watches with Armand Nicolet custom made watches.
Post a Comment