Oh, Henry!

The Bitchslap



To put this in its full context, here is the full question (or questions) that CNN's Ed Henry asked when first called upon.

ED HENRY: Thank you, Mr. President. You spoke again at the top about your anger about AIG. You've been saying that for days now. But why is it that it seems Andrew Cuomo seems to be in New York getting more actual action on it? And when you and Secretary Geithner first learned about this 10 days, two weeks ago, you didn't go public immediately with that that outrage -- you waited a few days, and then you went public after you realized Secretary Geithner really had no legal avenue to stop it.

And more broadly -- I just want to follow up on Chip and Jake -- you've been very critical of President Bush doubling the national debt. And to be fair, it's not just Republicans hitting you -- Democrat Kent Conrad, as you know, said, "When I look at this budget, I see the debt doubling again." You keep saying that you've inherited a big fiscal mess. Do you worry, though, that your daughters -- not to mention the next President -- will be inheriting an even bigger fiscal mess if the spending goes out of control?

What about your daughters, Mr. President? What about the children?! WON'T SOMEONE TAKE CARE OF THE CHILDREN?!

OBAMA: Of course I do, Ed, which is why we're doing everything we can to reduce that deficit. Look, if this were easy, then we would have already had it done, and the budget would have been voted on and everybody could go home. This is hard. And the reason it's hard is because we've accumulated a structural deficit that's going to take a long time, and we're not going to be able to do it next year or the year after or three years form now. What we have to do is bend the curve on these deficit projections. And the best way for us to do that is to reduce health care costs. That's not just my opinion; that's the opinion of almost every single person who has looked at our long-term fiscal situation.

Now, how do we -- how are we going to reduce health care costs -- because the problem is not just in government-run programs; the problem is in the private sector, as well. It's experienced by families, it's experienced by businesses. And so what we've said is, look, let's invest in health information technologies; let's invest in preventive care; let's invest in mechanisms that look at who's doing a better job controlling costs while producing good quality outcomes in various states, and let's reimburse on the basis of improved quality, as opposed to simply how many procedures you're doing. Let's do a whole host of things, some of which cost money on the front end but offer the prospect of reducing costs on the back end.

Now, the alternative is to stand pat and to simply say we are just going to not invest in health care, we're not going to take on energy; we'll wait until the next time that gas gets to $4 a gallon; we will not improve our schools, and we'll allow China or India or other countries to lap our young people in terms of their performance; we will settle on lower growth rates; and we will continue to contract, both as an economy and our ability to provide a better life for our kids.

That I don't think is the better option. Now, have -- am I completely satisfied with all the work that needs to be done on deficits? No. That's why I convened a fiscal responsibility summit, started in this room, to start looking at entitlements and to start looking at the big drivers of costs over the long term. Not all of those are reflected in our budget, partly because the savings we anticipate would be coming in years outside of the 10-year budget cycle that we're talking about. Okay?

Now, you'd think that Henry would have let the AIG thing go, but he insisted on an answer to his "Where's the outrage?" question, as if we're to judge President Obama by emotional outbursts and fist shaking indignation, forgetting that the American people rejected that type of drivel in November when John McCain lost the election. But Henry needed to get is gotcha question answered, and he's the one who was got.

HENRY: On AIG, why did you wait -- why did you wait days to come out and express that outrage? It seems like the action is coming out of New York and the Attorney General's Office. It took you days to come public with Secretary Geithner and say, look, we're outraged. Why did it take so long?

OBAMA: It took us a couple of days because I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak, you know? (Laughter.)

BAM! I can still see the well deserved handprint on Ed Henry's face. And sadly, MSNBC's Chuck Todd's question was not much better.

CHUCK TODD: ...Why, given this new era of responsibility that you're asking for, why haven't you asked for something specific that the public should be sacrificing to participate in this economic recovery?

Seriously, Chuck? You are the Chief White House Correspondent for NBC News and asking what the American people should sacrifice is the best you can do? Are half a million job losses a month, record foreclosures, skyrocketing health care costs for insurance that probably won't cover you, sprouting tent cities across the country, and at the very least losing more than half of your retirement savings in what you thought was a semi-secure 401K not sacrifice enough? Todd must have been taking bets with Henry on who could ask the better "gotcha" question. Either that, or he's been victimized by the "Washington bubble" everyone talks so much about.

(H/T Gottalaff)

Jim Cramer Picked the Wrong Guy to Fuck With

The Jim Cramer evisceration continues. And Joe Scarborough gets into the act. Joe Scarborough!



I believe Thrusday night at 11pm on Comedy Central is going to be a Must-See-TV night, as Stewart's guest is going to be... Jim Cramer! I would also suggest to The Scar that should he happen to criticize a show, perhaps he should watch it first.

Why Ann Coulter Is Still Insane (Yet another chapter in a never ending series.)

Poor Matt Lauer. He's got to deal with crazy Ann Coulter after she was rescheduled on The Today Show. For the second straight day, the conservative crack ho battles with herself in trying to get a word in egdewise, interrupting herself in an attempt to predict when Lauer would interrupt her.

I think she may have had an issue when younger of constantly being interrupted, or constantly told to shut her cakehole at the dinner table, to the point of refusing to be interrupted and being paranoid about it in adulthood.

Matt Lauer, like most other interviewers trying to tackle the impossible, just gives up on attepting to have a real discourse or debate and just reads the questions from his cards without a care about the answer, hoping Harry Smith would run onto the set and stab him in the temple with the pen he was contemplating using on himself only yesterday.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Pat Buchanan Is A Vampire

That's the only explanation I have for seeing this man on every MSNBC television show. He doesn't eat, he doesn't sleep. There he was on the inagural episode of The Rachel Maddow Show last night (review forthcoming) and this morning he's sitting on the panel of Morning Joe sans Joe. It's a much better show sans Joe. Maybe they should call it "Morning Sans Joe" when he's not there for a ratings boost.

Anyway, I'm guessing there's a coffin deep in the bowels of the NBC studios that Buchanan retreats to between appearances with only minor stops to the commissary along the way for a pint or two of human blood.