Showing posts with label Military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Military. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Factoid of the Day

Via GottaLaff:

...Until recently, the military has been a stalwart source of support for Republican hopeful Ron Paul. 
But in March, it was Obama that scooped up the most support from the armed forces -- about twice as much as Paul, in fact. Romney remains an also-ran when it comes to backing from the military... 
...members of the military who donated more than $200 have given Paul's campaign about $333,134, versus $184,505 to Obama and just $45,738 to Romney. 
But in March, Obama and Paul switched places. Members of the military sent $36,448 to Obama and just $17,733 to Paul. Even though Romney solidified his position as the presumptive Republican nominee, military donations to his campaign remained anemic -- only $8,630.

Saturday, December 17, 2011

President Obama's Weekly Address - December 17, 2011

Honoring Those Who Served in Iraq

Monday, November 21, 2011

Occupy Something

POSTED BY JHW22

A friend just posted a photo of troops in Afghanistan with a sign telling OWS protestors to quit bitchin'. I decided not to post that picture because I respect that the men chose to serve but disagree with them on their perspective and I don't want to add any animosity toward them personally when I rant. I don't want these particular men to be the ones I am speaking to because who I am really speaking to are all of the people who don't get some things about the OWS movement OR who are choosing to pretend it's something it isn't.

First of all, don't forget that some in the OWS movement are vets who came home to no jobs.

Also, I know a lot of people who go to the OWS protests on their days off or after work. I also know of some people who telecommute from the protests. So the idea that every supporter of OWS is jobless isn't completely accurate.

And finally, seems odd that Republicans have been "bitchin'" about the unemployment rate, so why is it when unemployed people take a stand on the lack of jobs because of failed economic policies, there's a flip on who should be bitchin' and who should shut up?

I have to admit that I am not a full supporter of OWS, nor am I against it. There are things I agree with and things I don't. As with any movement of frustrated people, some are saying things I applaud and some are saying things that piss me off. I can't get on board to the point of going down to one or following any of them on Twitter. But I do feel it's necessary to call bullshit on false memes about them. Really, the OWS people are taking a different approach to expressing the same frustrations many in the Tea Party expressed.

We're all pissed about a lot of the same things. The difference is the Tea Party half-assed their anger (being mad at the wrong things in most cases) and they half-assed their protests. Sure they made a big mess of the health care reform debates. But where were they during the last six months? Nowhere. They dropped the "mad at too much of anything that bugs us" ball and the OWS protestors picked it up and have run with it. They are mad a lot of the same things and people, but generally more for the right reasons and with far less undermining influences trying to take over.


So I find it amusing when the Republicans bitch and moan about the unemployment rate and want to say Obama and Geithner and Bernanke and Pelosi and anyone else they don't like is to blame for there being "no jobs" and then they turn around and tell protestors, protestors with more dedication than the Tea Party protestors, to get a job. Remember, Republicans, you keep telling us there are no jobs. You keep telling us Obama killed jobs, that he hasn't created any jobs. Yet, you want these OWS people to go get one?

Please.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

President Obama's Weekly Address - November 12, 2011

Honoring Our Veterans for Their Service and Sacrifice

Sunday, December 26, 2010

President Obama's Weekly Address - December 25, 2010

Merry Christmas from the President & First Lady

Saturday, November 27, 2010

President Obama's Weekly Address - November 27, 2010

Giving Thanks for Those Who Serve



*Note: This week's address was made on Thanksgiving Day, November 25th.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

North Korea Attacks South Korea

NY Times: SEOUL, South Korea — North and South Korea exchanged artillery fire on Tuesday after dozens of shells fired from the North struck a South Korean island near the countries’ disputed maritime border, South Korean military officials said. Two South Korean soldiers were killed, 15 were wounded and three civilians were injured, said Kiyheon Kwon, an official at the Defense Ministry.
And wingnuts blame Obama in 5, 4, 3...

Sunday, September 19, 2010

This Is Horrifying

Washington Post: Members of U.S. platoon in Afghanistan accused of killing civilians for sport
...According to charging documents, the unprovoked, fatal attack on Jan. 15 was the start of a months-long shooting spree against Afghan civilians that resulted in some of the grisliest allegations against American soldiers since the U.S. invasion in 2001. Members of the platoon have been charged with dismembering and photographing corpses, as well as hoarding a skull and other human bones.
The subsequent investigation has raised accusations about whether the military ignored warnings that the out-of-control soldiers were committing atrocities. The father of one soldier said he repeatedly tried to alert the Army after his son told him about the first killing, only to be rebuffed.
Winning hearts and minds.

Stories like this show how a few bad apples can make the entire military look bad, endanger fellow soldiers and jeopardize missions years in the making.

Saturday, May 29, 2010

President Obama's Weekly Address - May 29, 2010

Honoring the Fallen

Thursday, February 12, 2009

GOP Humor (Or Lack Of It)

It seems that Kyle Smith is either 1) just another lackey doing the the bidding of Rupert Murdoch or 2) proof that Republicans don't have a sense of humor, their sensibilities are blinded by ideology and the last thing they should be doing as a careers should have absolutely nothing to do with the arts, especially being a theatre critic.

Will Ferrell's new Broadway show You're Welcome America. A Final Night With George W. Bush has received mostly positive praise from critics. However, what New York Post "critic" Kyle Smith calls a review, I call a conservative Republican's angry response to something they decided they would hate before watching, and may as well been written for Red State, American Thinker or Michelle Malkin's blogs.

What most anger's Smith during Ferrell's show is the moment of silence to honor those who have sacrificed their lives for the "War on Terror."

Ferrell/Bush asks the audience for a moment of silence to honor our troops who died in Iraq and Afghanistan. At the performance I saw, most of the audience members went silent but a few tittered nervously. Who can blame them? This is a comedy show. They were expecting a gag, and they soon got one.

After a few seconds of silence a phone on the stage rings, and everyone laughs. The relief is palpable. Hurrah! That thing about honoring our war dead? It really was just the setup to a joke!
Wrong. I know it's wrong because I saw the show. This is the one moment in the entire almost 90 minute act that was sincere. It was Will Ferrell dropping his Bush mask just a bit and honestly asking for a moment of silence for our fallen soldiers. The silence was deafening. You could hear a pin drop. We all sat there "for a few seconds" (more like 20 or so) realizing that while we were laughing at the caricature Ferrell was creating on stage, the buffoon that got us into the mess we're in really did ruin countless thousands, hundreds of thousands of lives. And it was a wake up call. We can poke fun at this failure of a President, but we can't forget what he's destroyed.

Now if Smith knew anything about theatre - the medium that this ass is apparently a "critic" of - he would know that this was the ending of a scene. I wonder if Smith would have objected to the silence had the lights faded to black and then restored with the phone ringing? Would that have separated the two scenes in Smith's little brain for him to see that this was a transition into the next section of the show?

Of course, Smith plays the dutiful little GOP wingnut in assuming that this was all a setup for a punchline, outraged that Ferrell and director Adam McKay "are so confident that everyone shares their contempt for Bush that they slosh over into contempt for all things associated with Bush: the show includes cracks about Texas, Christianity, and finally the military."

Wrong again. Ferrell never pokes fun at the military in this show. Ever. But I suppose to get the proper conservative frenzy that his rag of a paper calls it's readership, Smith has to appeal to the basest emotions of someone who hasn't seen what he's reviewing and dissuade them from attending by accusing Ferrell of being un-American. No matter. Anyone reading the New York Post is too busy watching Wifeswap to attend live theatre.

The problem with Smith's review is that he doesn't allow himself to view the show objectively. His Republican sensitivities were raw nerves on the surface of his thin skin and he could not bring himself to critique in a theatrical or comedic sense. His vision was skewed by his ideology. And he makes it plain for all to see:
Ferrell mouths a few Bush malapropisms backed by the words "actual quote" projected on the screen behind him. If I were Bush, I'd reply: "If you think you've never screwed up, I've got three words for you: 'Semi-Pro.' " ...

...The military is the military. It isn't going to whine. It isn't going to organize a team of protesters to cause a ruckus in front of the Cort Theatre. It is just going to keep its head down and drive on. The military's finest men and women will continue to be ignored at best and loathed at worst. No Medal of Honor winner will get even one percent of the publicity Ferrell will generate with this show. For every hundred books written about the failures in Iraq, there will be one paragraph written about the post-surge turnaround.

But is it too much to ask for our war dead to not be ridiculed by wealthy comedians? Maybe those who fly on private jets, live in closely policed communities with surveillance cameras covering every inch of their property and send their kids to private school don't understand that there is such a thing as public security, and that it isn't a joke.
Smith doesn't even see the irony in that last sentence as former President Bush is moving to an exclusive Dallas whites-only suburb. But as usual, Republicans are immune to irony.

Finally, Smith leaves with a wag of the finger parting shot as he suggests Ferrell drop the "jokey" moment of silence from the upcoming HBO special and apologize to the troops on a USO tour to Iraq. Perhaps if he could name a couple of Republican comedians (if there is such a thing as GOP humor) who've been on a USO tour, I might take him seriously. I, on the other hand, hope that the HBO special will be uncut, complete with the sincere moment of silence to show how incredibly wrong Kyle Smith was in his backward assessment of Ferrell, the show, and his mindset.

(H/T Armadillo Joe for bringing Alicublog to my attention.)

Friday, June 13, 2008

"Not Too Important"

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Another McThuselah Flip Flop

I've been working on a post in my head about the flip flops of John McCain; there are so many, it's taken me a little longer to write than I've anticipated. But in the meantime, here's one that was recently uncovered.

On military presence in Iraq -

John McCain, January 2008: "Maybe a hundred [years]. We've been in South Korea, we've been in Japan for 60 years. We've been in South Korea for 50 years or so. That'd be fine with me as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed."

John McCain, January 2005: "...I think one of our big problems has been the fact that many Iraqis resent American military presence. And I don't pretend to know exactly Iraqi public opinion. But as soon as we can reduce our visibility as much as possible, the better I think it is going to be."

Now you can say that he's re-evaluated his stance on judgments he's made between then and now - which is fine - but 1) being in Iraq strategically doesn't change the fact that our military presence is resented which then makes whatever mission du jour harder and more dangerous and 2) if a Democrat had said this, the GOP and the media would be jumping all over this as a classic case of flip flopping and not looking at the "nuance" of the answers. So, if it's okay with the Republicans to criticize in this manner (because you know it's coming), then it's okay for Democrats to respond in kind.

Friday, June 15, 2007

Weapons of Mass Destruction Found... in Our Oceans!


Well apparently we needed to look no further than off our shores to find weapons of mass destruction. We invaded Iraq to look for something that wasn't there, because it was being dumped just off our coastline.

From the Daily Press:

"The Army now admits that it secretly dumped 64 million pounds of nerve and mustard agents into the sea, along with 400,000 chemical-filled bombs, land mines and rockets and more than 500 tons of radioactive waste - either tossed overboard or packed into the holds of scuttled vessels."

"We do not claim to know where they all are," said William Brankowitz, a deputy project manager in the Army Chemical Materials Agency and a leading authority on the Army's chemical weapons dumping."We don't want to be cavalier at all and say this stuff was exposed to water and is OK. It can last for a very, very long time."

Hundreds of dolphins washed ashore in Virginia and New Jersey shorelines in 1987 with burns similar to mustard gas exposure. One marine-mammal specialist suspects Army-dumped chemical weapons killed them.


This is a facsinating story that should be read in full.


Friday, January 5, 2007

Still Got Your Limbs? You're Going Back.


We speak of the over 3,000 dead American soldiers but don't often think about the wounded. At this point, there are over 150,000 Iraq Veterans receiving diability benefits, according to the Veterans Administration. This is due, in part, to the medical advances that have happened in the last 30 years. Injuries, that in the past would have been fatal, can now be better treated on site and thus save the soldier. But now it seems that Post Traumatic Stress Disorder is minor and treatable, according to the US Military, and soldiers suffering from PTSD can be redeployed. This is outrageous!


EXCERPT:
On Christmas... Army Reservist James Dean barricaded himself in his father's home with several weapons and threatened to kill himself. After a 14-hour standoff with authorities, Dean was killed by a police officer after he aimed a gun at another officer, authorities told the Washington Post.

Veterans for America's [Steve] Robinson told Inter Press Service that Dean, who had already served 18 months in Afghanistan, had been diagnosed with PTSD. He had just been informed that his unit would be sent to Iraq on Jan. 14.

"We call that suicide by cop," Robinson said.


I don't know about you, and I can't imagine what these troops are going through, but I can only think that if I were in their situation, I'd want someone of sound mind next to me and not worrying if he'd taken his medication that day. Why would you want anyone who is medicated to have a firearm is his/her hand?

Read the story.

 
ShareThis